Tuesday, November 08, 2005

An Observation

Today, many of my friends have headed to the poll-booths around town, to caste their vote one way or the other in regards to same-sex marriage. Obviously, in light of previous posts, you might have guessed the political bias of the majority of my friends.

One of those friends even called to remind me to make sure and go vote. I've learned in life (especially during bridal showers) that a good rule of thumb for all relationships is: pick your battles. So, I chose not to let on that I had no intention of voting today.

So, all that to say - this is my observation. Take it or leave it. It is pretty well-known that evangelical Christians, as a generalization, cause quite an uproar in conversations regarding free will vs. election/predestination. Many place high value on the theology that centers on man's free will to choose whether to live "rightly" or "wrongly". To choose to "follow Christ" or "sin". How often have I heard that God's relationship with man hinges on the understanding that we have the power to choose or reject him. And that it was incredibly important to God that we have that freedom.

And yet, today, those same evangelicals are fighting like crazy to prevent that same mankind from really having that option in regards to the kind of marriage relationship they choose. How many evangelicals (and others in the Christian community who might not classify themselves as such) are making this decision an important, landmark statement of faith. To prevent their fellow human beings (Christian or not) from having the freedom to choose what Christians would say is God's ideal for marriage. What they believe to be "right".

I just find it an interesting observation, that these Christians don't want to allow one another the same freedom they will fight like crazy to maintain is central to God's character.

So that's why I'm not voting. (If you're curious about the matter.) I don't think it's my place to decide whether or not someone is revoked of the freedom to not choose God's way over their own. (Of course, it's an ironic statement because I lean more toward calvinistic theology than my friends.) It's not really that I agree with the other side. I just don't think the decision as a whole is my business. It's not my call. Each person has a choice to make every day. To develop intimacy with God, or not. And I believe that intimacy affects the choices we make. I can't make that decision for them. And I can't tell them which one to choose. I can express the joy I've personally experienced from choosing God's way over my own. But the decision is entirely theirs, and the consequences, blessings, and results of that decision are theirs also. It seems out of line to take it upon myself to limit their freedom.

So, that is my two cents on that subject. Maybe it gives you a new insight to chew on, maybe it makes you incredibly mad. Either way - you're thinking about it!

5 Comments:

Blogger DeeDee Price said...

Kathryn,
Hey girl! I do remember you, that was an awful class! I was trying to keep the peace while I was there, so I missed quite a few people that I would have liked to have seen. It is so overwhelming at times at homecoming. I completely understand what you are saying. I avoid a lot of people for the same reason.

I love your honesty on the matter. I completely understand where you are coming from, and I applaud your courage for stepping out. In the church today, if you do not vote or feel politically the way others dom you can really be targeted. Thank you for being brave enough to say that you do not know and that you will not vote on something you do not 100% agree with. I wish others were like you.

Take care, and I would love to keep in contact with you!
DeeDee Wilburn

9:56 AM  
Blogger Unknown said...

Hey! I totally agree with you. I was at my church building on Tuesday and one of our members, a member of city council, was pressing me to vote. I didn't tell him why I didn't think it really mattered, but simply shrugged and told him I hadn't registered at my new address yet. I really wanted to tell him to use the same zeal to share the love of Christ with homosexuals and let them deal with their life and heart before God, rather than try to prevent them from having a lifestyle we don't approve of. This mentality gets us nowhere.

Thanks for your thoughts!

2:31 PM  
Blogger Margaret Feinberg said...

Forgive my lack of access to newspapers...but how did the election turn out?

5:58 PM  
Blogger Kathryn Young said...

As some of you may know, Texas has declared that the only recognized marriage union is between one man and one woman.

Not surprising. Texas is dominated politically by Southern Baptist conservatives.

To clarify:
And by no means do I think that God desires/created it to be any other way. I only mean to express my personal opinion that we as Christians have begun fighting some battles that I don't think we need to fight. I don't believe it is my place to stand on a platform and shout out to a group of people that they are 'living in sin' and 'going to hell'. When Jesus confronted the sin in a person's life, he did it privately and intimately...built on a relationship of trust and sincere devotion to that person as a person.

My point is that I think we [Christians] need to rethink how we respond to sin. But especially to become more concerned with our own ("plank in our own eye") than that of others ("speck in theirs"). From what I see in scripture, including the verse to which I just referred (Matt 7:1-5), I believe that we have overstepped our bounds in our interests in the sin/choices of others.

4:03 PM  
Blogger Margaret Feinberg said...

Thanks for your amazing insights into Romans--that was awesome.... I hadn't thought about that chapter that way..it's a perfect fit. Maybe you should cut and paste it on your blog...it's such a great entry!!!

11:02 AM  

Post a Comment

<< Home